Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 11th Jun 2012 22:23 UTC
Apple Marco Arment: "After two years, the Mac Pro was 'updated' today, sort of: now we can choose slightly faster two-year-old CPUs at the top end, and the other two-year-old CPU options are cheaper now. That's about it. No Xeon E5 CPUs, no USB 3, no Thunderbolt. They're even shipping the same two-year-old graphics cards. Same motherboard, slightly different CPU options from 2010. That's it. The message is clear: Apple doesn't give a shit about the Mac Pro." Paint, red, scout, girl.
Permalink for comment 521707
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: But why?
by lfeagan on Tue 12th Jun 2012 15:28 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: But why? "
lfeagan
Member since:
2006-04-01

In my case, I would be okay with the 6 to 8 cores of a single socket but need massive amounts of memory. Having 12 to 16 slots allows me to get sufficient capacity using 8GB DIMMs. Frankly, the Mac Pro having only 64GB capacity is a bit lame. The 2010 generation of Intel Xeon motherboards generally had 192GB capacity. (2 sockets x 3 channels/socket x 2 slots/channel x 16GB DIMM/slot = 192GB).

All of the technologies necessary to build an updated Mac Pro are also available on non-Apple machines (including Thunderbolt). Apple should not need to dedicate as much engineering effort today as would have been required two years ago. They should consider simply partnering with SuperMicro to OEM them a board with some extra IO headers for FireWire 800 and ThunderBolt and shove it in the current case.

Reply Parent Score: 1