Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 11th Jun 2012 00:38 UTC, submitted by judgen
Permalink for comment 521746
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-03-26
In the instances where pointers were required, there was usually a wrapper API.
VB didn't have to compile to P Code. Their was an option to compile to native code, which did perform better.
"Native code" wasn't technically native though. It was still managed byte code of some description and thus still suffered from major performance penalties.
It also still had OCX dependencies, which sucked hard given that ActiveX is one of the worst things to come out of Redmond since Bob and Me.