Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 14th Jun 2012 15:15 UTC, submitted by Jos
Permalink for comment 522053
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
I agree, the very much avoidable Symbian collapse is a huge problem, but where you see hope for the Lumia I see complete failure by any standards you care to name - profitability, average sales price, market share, desirability, brand, you name it.
The problem is that in order to compete in the markets you mention (the developed world - highly saturated markets) you need a much better phone than the Lumia series can provide (you're going against the iPhone), OR you need high sales volume on a profitable handset (current Lumias are sold at cost or at loss, and no, it's not relevant if you report a 500% growth if your baseline share was 0.1%).
If you try to compete in those markets with a product that barely cuts it as a mid-range phone and neglect markets with much, much higher growth potential like India or China where you were enjoying a dominant market position... then you're simply trying to commit suicide...