Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 14th Jun 2012 15:15 UTC, submitted by Jos
Permalink for comment 522099
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-03-17
Things make perfect sense if you look at it from the perspective of a Microsoft shareholder not a Nokia one, the current CEO of Nokia has (or used to have) a very sizable quantity of Microsoft stock.
Nokia is stuck with having to bet the farm as the OEM of a 3rd party commodity OS with little penetration in the market.
Frankly I have no idea why Nokia's shareholders haven't sued the shit out of Elop and friends for the clear conflict of interests, but then again holding Nokia stock currently does not really seem like a display of intelligence. Unless they are betting on Microsoft buying Nokia through a decent stock offer.
Edited 2012-06-15 01:01 UTC