Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 14th Jun 2012 15:15 UTC, submitted by Jos
Permalink for comment 522132
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-05-19
That's because they aren't. There was a breakdown in the WSJ last week about the profit margin on the Lumia 900 versus the iPhone 4S, complete with a price breakdown of every component of the phone. I don't remember the exact figures, but Nokia is profiting in close to $300 on each Lumia sold; Apple pulls in over $400.
You mean this infographic: http://www.phonearena.com/news/WSJ-infographic-of-the-Lumia-900-and...
Nokia is earning $241 per Lumia 900, versus Appleās $459 per iPhone 4S. For Apple, that's a gross margin of nearly 70%.
Of course, this is due largely to the substantially higher carrier subsidy that Apple gets. Apple has a market-dominant position, and is not afraid to throw its weight around. Most of its profits come directly from the carrier's pocket.