Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th Jun 2012 12:19 UTC
Permalink for comment 522634
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-15
Been watching sparkly vampires again, eh?
-------------------------------------------
PS. No, I actually just recently lambasted Microsoft for completely ignoring UI consistency and design on my Google+, noting that they themselves are one of the worst offenders on Windows-platform. On Linux if you stick to only GNOME-applications or only KDE-applications you actually get a whole lot more consistent look and feel, but that obviously does not help people using other OSes.
The thing is that UI consistency cannot really be fixed by random people, the push for consistency must come from the OS/desktop environment/hardware manufacturer/developer. The people in charge just think "let's make our app stand out like a stick in the eye so that people will remember it!" unless there is a real disincentive for doing that, so something like e.g. taking extra tax on Windows Store/App Store/etc. applications that break UI consistency could possibly work. Another approach would be to push such applications out of the front-pages and to favor applications that stick to UI consistency - guidelines.