Linked by Elv13 on Sun 17th Jun 2012 10:35 UTC
Permalink for comment 522827
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-02-18
If they NEED such thing, just REFUSE to boot on machines where this feature is available and was disabled. Nothing more, nothing less. It keep its toys and let the others play with theirs. "
At some point, customers (government, big business) will _require_ "secure" booting. Telling them to buy "insecure" systems (or disabling the secure boot feature) won't fly.