Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 19th Jun 2012 21:31 UTC
Permalink for comment 523044
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-27
The reviewers seem to have a list of comparisons to judge the new OS with. They won't care about the UI as much as RIM does. Consumers won't have a chance to find out if they would like any new features that the OS provides, especially if they are not in a cycle to change their phones out.
A non-physical keyboard on this is also killer... killer bad.
That RIM believes they needed a new OS in order to stay competitive is bad.
BB7 devices should be continued and the company should stick with bread-and-butter, and making those better, not a gamble.
Palm gambled even though it had a solid OS base. A big change in OS and design will alienate those who are currently keeping the company afloat.