Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 21st Jun 2012 09:50 UTC
Permalink for comment 523156
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-08-09
What Oracle is saying here is that damages was always a red herring, they are chasing after ongoing infringement that would require Google to buy a license (which will probably be in terms of a cost per device). The maximum damages were always a lot lower than the potential of getting a slice of the Android pie indefinitely, and possibly being able to bring it back into the more Oracle-controlled Java sphere.