Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 23rd Jun 2012 20:18 UTC
Permalink for comment 523686
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-02-10
You need to look at a bigger picture. Nothing improves over time in isolation. Despite the fact that a lot of our intelligent machinery is coded in DNA (biological computer program) we still require massive amounts of input from our parents, school teachers, books, society, etc. All these external factors continually program our brains over many years. Otherwise, how do you tell the difference between good and evil, or courage and cowardice?
Complex AI is definitely possible, but will need a lot of research, development and evolution before it can overtake human intelligence. "
I think you have nailed the idea that a man's moral code is subjective(he alone can choose of what is good) w/o any external influences or some religious moral law. This argument mostly comes from the atheists when they formulate arguments against Christianity. Just do an experiment, isolate a human being (w/o any external influences) then put him on a situation where a baby was rammed by a vehicle, and lets see what he/she will do.