Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 26th Jun 2012 19:50 UTC
Apple Benedict Evans: "How do you segment without fragmenting? Apple achieved this pretty easily with the iPod by varying the storage, but that wouldn't be meaningful for the iPhone. The cheap one has to run the apps, but people still have to have a reason to buy the expensive one. What you can do is vary the Apple supplied features, without varying the hardware and API platform that your third-party developers are targeting." Like I said: iOS 6 Starter, iOS6 Home, iOS 6 Professional, and iOS 6 Ultimate. Microsoft got blasted for confusing and arbitrary segmentation - rightfully so - but as usual, Apple gets a free pass when it does the exact same thing. At least Microsoft uses different names and forces OEMs to be clear about what they're shipping. I've said it before: I find calling all these different versions "iOS 6" without modifiers pretty scummy and misleading.
Permalink for comment 523993
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Versions
by ilovebeer on Wed 27th Jun 2012 15:05 UTC in reply to "RE: Versions"
ilovebeer
Member since:
2011-08-08

" Ca we now stop whining about there not being version numbers?

The point is that there is a version number, but it's hidden in the fine print at http://www.apple.com/ios/ios6/.

Call me picky, but for all intents and purposes the iPhone 3GS won't be really running the same OS as the 4S or its yet unannounced successor. Maybe you don't have a problem with it and that's fine, but talking about fragmentation versus segmentation seems like hair splitting to me.
"
Won't be running the same OS? So you think, then, that a 3GS will be running a different OS. Do you also think Windows 7 Ultimate is a different OS from Windows 7 Home? ........No, it is not a different OS, and neither is what a 3GS will be running.

Why is it people always go with extremes here over the rational and common sense?

Reply Parent Score: 1