Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 27th Jun 2012 20:27 UTC
Permalink for comment 524056
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-22
I honestly have no idea where to start.
How about starting with dealing with an operating system model that means that only 7% of Android devices runs Android 4 and 90% run 2.3.7 or earlier. Given those figures gushing reviews of 4.1 seem - well - theoretical given that it's probable that it's going to be years before even a sizeable minority of Android users actually run it. I am not knocking 4.1 but it seems to me that the absurd rate of OS adoption in the Android ecosystem is the elephant in the room. Until that is addressed then new versions of the OS seem superfluous.