Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 27th Jun 2012 20:27 UTC
Permalink for comment 524279
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-09-01
Nexus is not sold at cost. And yes nexus tablet is about baseline; the price and business model baseline for Android tablets have been set: sell at cost and get revenue from ads. Not that selling at cost is a precedent in business.
Rest of your comment I agree fully, business model change is an example of that. Besides if Nexus pushes devs to give tablet form factor more love, other OEMS (ones that try to innovate) my in fact take advantage. I just wonder if this pushes Samsung (on a tablet space) into MS arms. As far as tablets are concerned they don't have any OS choice of their own atm.
(edit: hey I forgot about WebOS, that would be cool!).
In the end it's matter of trust and you have to compare MS and Google by their track record. Google's is mostly balanced (they partnerships didn't hurt partners, but ended up pretty unsuccessful) while MS is a horror story with Nokia being massacred before our eyes.
Edited 2012-06-29 05:54 UTC