Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 30th Jun 2012 19:34 UTC
Legal Yesterday, we were treated to another preliminary injunction on a product due to patent trolling. Over the past few years, some companies have resorted to patent trolling instead of competing on merit, using frivolous and obvious software and design patents to block competitors - even though this obviously shouldn't be legal. The fact that this is, in fact, legal, is baffling, and up until a few months ago, a regular topic here on OSNews. At some point - I stopped reporting on the matter. The reason for this is simple: I realised that intellectual property law exists outside of regular democratic processes and is, in fact, wholly and utterly totalitarian. What's the point in reporting on something we can't change via legal means?
Permalink for comment 524596
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: A questions for Thom
by Thom_Holwerda on Sat 30th Jun 2012 22:14 UTC in reply to "A questions for Thom"
Member since:

Can you give us examples of these democratic processes that IP law sits outside?

You can't just say that the processes are undemocratic because you don't like the outcomes.

I don't think you read the article.

Reply Parent Score: 2