Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 30th Jun 2012 19:34 UTC
Legal Yesterday, we were treated to another preliminary injunction on a product due to patent trolling. Over the past few years, some companies have resorted to patent trolling instead of competing on merit, using frivolous and obvious software and design patents to block competitors - even though this obviously shouldn't be legal. The fact that this is, in fact, legal, is baffling, and up until a few months ago, a regular topic here on OSNews. At some point - I stopped reporting on the matter. The reason for this is simple: I realised that intellectual property law exists outside of regular democratic processes and is, in fact, wholly and utterly totalitarian. What's the point in reporting on something we can't change via legal means?
Permalink for comment 524622
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: not a ptatent troll
by andydread on Sun 1st Jul 2012 02:22 UTC in reply to "not a ptatent troll"
andydread
Member since:
2009-02-02

Words are important, they convey meaning. Apple is not a patent troll. You may disagree with them, but trying to use the wrong term, or the right term in the wrong way, just weakens your argument.

Please define what you *think* patent troll means, then go look up the actual meaning of it, and then find out what the proper term you should be using.



How about Apple is an abuser of trivial and obvious software patents such as slide to unlock and multisource search. So Apple is a patent abuser not a patent troll. They also qualify for the term hypocrite.

" We have always been shameless about stealing great ideas" - Steve Jobs

Reply Parent Score: 8