Linked by Drumhellar on Thu 28th Jun 2012 11:18 UTC
Permalink for comment 524698
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-09-01
Right, but the author didn't specify what he was comparing it to. He just said VMware, which could mean anything like that. Including VMware Server even if it is EOLd.
It was criticism to show he needs to be more specific in his writing. It's obvious to him what he's comparing it to, but not to us.
Including Hyper-V in Windows consumer versions, versus server versions, automatically puts Hyper-V into the VMware Workstation and Virtualbox class of product.
Edited 2012-07-01 19:04 UTC