Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 30th Jun 2012 19:34 UTC
Legal Yesterday, we were treated to another preliminary injunction on a product due to patent trolling. Over the past few years, some companies have resorted to patent trolling instead of competing on merit, using frivolous and obvious software and design patents to block competitors - even though this obviously shouldn't be legal. The fact that this is, in fact, legal, is baffling, and up until a few months ago, a regular topic here on OSNews. At some point - I stopped reporting on the matter. The reason for this is simple: I realised that intellectual property law exists outside of regular democratic processes and is, in fact, wholly and utterly totalitarian. What's the point in reporting on something we can't change via legal means?
Permalink for comment 524754
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Lorin
Member since:
2010-04-06

Look at history, Google owned Android, Inc years before IOS existed.

Crunchpad existed as a prototype product before iPad existed.

I guess that means Apple should stop ripping off all the prior art their products are based on.

Reply Parent Score: 2