Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 25th Jun 2012 09:50 UTC
Microsoft I'm very thankful for Danny Sullivan writing this article, because it touches upon a subject I've increasingly been frustrated with: the inflation of the term 'hands-on'. Hands-on used to mean that a journalist, blogger, or reviewer got to properly use a device to get some sort of first impression, usually guided by some words from the manufacturer. These days, however, it seems as if even merely getting a glance at a device is regarded as a 'hands-on'.
Permalink for comment 524866
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Modern journalism is hands-off
by zima on Mon 2nd Jul 2012 23:59 UTC in reply to "Modern journalism is hands-off"
Member since:

Modern journalism is about repeating press releases and reporting on what spokesmen have to say.

That's really nothing new.

Don't imply the old ways were necessarily better - easy to fall into outright "old times were better" myths that way. We have archives of old newspapers, they were often RIDICULOUS (seriously, do a daily habit of looking through some your regional respectable and/or widely circulated newspaper edition from exactly 100 years prior)

It was often worse, there was just not much comparison, not much access to independent media - of course it seemed reliable without much dissenting information or voices.

Edited 2012-07-03 00:06 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2