Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 3rd Jul 2012 19:15 UTC, submitted by tupp
Permalink for comment 525086
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-01-28
Ideally, if DRM interferes with our right to resell software (or any fair use rights for that matter), then the publisher ought to be legally required to work with customers on a case by case for free in order to help us exercise our rights under the law. We should be entitled to compensation should any publisher continue to violate *our* rights after fair use requests.
Not that I want "compensation", quite the opposite, I want access my fair use rights under the law. Trouble today is that ignoring consumer fair use rights has become standard operating practice. Many software companies habitually take away consumer rights they're not authorised to in the first place. Without a monetary threat, they're likely to continue being irrespectful of our rights.
Companies ask customers to respect their rights, the least they can do is respect ours as well.