Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 2nd Jul 2012 22:17 UTC
Permalink for comment 525154
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-09-21
Its not the devs who decide, its the management.
Forth of whom? Its from Samsung and to my knowledge its there first try to make an own Smartphone-OS. Bada is for low-end, Android not there's (controlled and developed by someone else).
Even google does not put all its eggs into the Android basket. They are doing those ChromeOS. Another web-based (means Javascript driven) OS. Why? Because a) one does not fit all and b) it's good to have options since when you have all your eggs in only one basket you may end like Nokia.
Speaking of Nokia. I think with 4th attempt you refer to them? They are not into Tizen. Or what do you mean?
With using a webrenderer for the frontend, like Gecko or WebKit, that goes away. Or atleast that's my understanding.
How is that different from Android?
The thing here is that its completely another concept. A system which runs in a browser (only) may close some doors but it opens others. That's what our whole industry is about: invent and try something new. be ahead of your competition and push something to the market that opens new doors and sells well.
It already is a good idea independent of the result. To stay into the market you need to continue to invent and try something new. The moment you do not any longer will be when competition wins.
Tizen is already a good idea cause there is a clear trend towards a browser-based system. If they all fail then nothing is lost. But if one of them succeeds Samsung could risk to lose it's current position as number #1 mobile device seller. But if they have already something that can compete with a browserOS product from somebody else then they at least can try to fight.
What happens when you stop inventing is currently demonstrated by Nokia.