Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Jul 2012 23:08 UTC
Permalink for comment 525411
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-16
How novel is it, really, to use a single search box for finding things from multiple sources? That's considered a patentable innovation? Really?!? It seems like common sense to me. No wonder the U.S. economy is in the toilet. My problem with software patents is that they're not unlike patenting mathematical equations or other physical constants. Let's face it, a smart phone is really just a computer; it contains a CPU, memory and an instruction set. To posit that running commands on a computer can be novel or unique is simply absurd. It's like saying that 1+1+2+2 is a unique way of calculating 3+3 or that CERN is entitled to patent the Higgs-Boson when they find it. The patent system in the United States is, and has been for a very long time, hopelessly broken. Large corporations have for years amassed huge patent portfolios for "inventions" that they then use to manipulate or suppress competitors. Instead of recognizing that everyone benefits from competition (as it makes companies truly innovate to stay ahead of the pack,) litigation and mediocrity have won the day. To my mind, a true innovation stands on its own and makes consumers want those innovations. It shouldn't require litigation to stop consumers from buying one product in favor of another - the innovation should be the compelling factor. That Apple has resorted to patent trolling to stymie Samsung and other smart phone manufactures only proves that its own offerings aren't innovating or unique enough to compel users to purchase them to the exclusion of competitor products. Patent trolling and forced downgrades are simply two more reasons I'll add to my list of many, many reasons, never to purchase Apple products. Obviously I'm not missing anything.
Edited 2012-07-05 14:46 UTC