Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 5th Jul 2012 23:07 UTC
Permalink for comment 525541
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-06-30
Many of your ideas (untransferable ownership of patents by their inventors) won't ever be peacefully accepted. Equally well, or maybe even easier, you could call for abolishing the whole patent system.
I you want a better analysis of the current situation watch the excellent "patent pollution problem" talk: www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfH8iyNjpYo
For me, the best solutions would be to either: abolish the patent system completely (it has always been restraining innovation, never promoting it) or go back to the origin: grant patents in exchange for trade secrets that cannot be reproduced by other experts in the field in a week of work. Only then, the society (ultimately patents are granted by consumers) gets a net benefit from the deal.