Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 13th Jul 2012 23:39 UTC
Permalink for comment 526883
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-09-23
First sentence directly being an insult, yay, that's how we start arguments.
Works without problems. You just have to provide the dynamic libraries it was specifically compiled against. Same on Windows with the DLLs.
SDL and Qt are not operating system APIs. "
True. But they are competing with APIs from Microsoft like DirectX, MFC and Win32 and they are gaining more and more market share due to their cross-platform compatibility.
Valve just hired the lead developer of SDL.
https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#technotes/tn2223/_index.htm...
https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/MapKit/Refere...
https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/Cocoa/Referen...
http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#qa/qa1342/_index.html
https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#qa/qa1679/_index.html
I can list much more if you wish, specially the NeXTStep APIs no longer available.
Deprecating parts of the API while providing good documentation on these changes is a very good thing.
That is GNUStep, not Cocoa, with lots of missing functionality. "
I didn't claim that. However, GNUStep does allow to run many MacOS applications on Linux. It is demonstrated by the guy in the talk.
Anyone with a decent experience developing software across multiple operating systems, knows that Microsoft world is quite bearable, when compared with many of the commercial enterprise systems available. "
There aren't really any other commercial platforms left. Alpha, Solaris, HP-UX and so on don't really exist anymore.
Different teams, even working in different buildings. "
This doesn't justify anything. It works for Apple and it works at Google. Microsoft is just incredibly bad in this regard.
Heck, they don't even know how to read out the home directory on MacOS X using an environment variable, they always assume your home directory is in /Users (try using Microsoft software for MacOS X with a case-sensitive filesystem).
The same platform lockin like any other commercial vendor. "
No. http://opensource.apple.com/
Great! Where I do buy such hardware with Linux? "
What is your problem? Most ARM devices shipped nowadays run Linux. Just use your favorite internet search engine and you will be happy.
What are your developer credentials to talk about stability of operating system APIs?
Are we going to compare penis lengths now? This is not how you're going to win an argument. It's like saying "My parents are richer than yours, so I must be right!"
You can argue whatever you want, but Microsoft is doomed to decline in the future (just like ATARI or Commodore). Just have a look how many companies are jumping the Linux bandwagon. Valve, being probably one of the most important game publishers, is hiring Linux developers like crazy. And even Microsoft itself contributes lots of code to the Linux world (Skype 4.0, Hyper-V).
I feel really sorry for people who are so attached to Microsoft that they're even willing to waive for features and usability when switching from Windows 7 to the awkward Windows 8.
Adrian