Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 18th Jul 2012 17:10 UTC
Permalink for comment 527330
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-06-09
UK judge said it doesn't copied iPad design. A *judge*.
The logical consequence - in UK - is that saying you think Samsung copied the iPad design is still your speech freedom, but *claiming* it publicly by going to court like Apple did is wrong, and come with consequence.
Like publicly say what you previously claimed was false.
Keep calm, your beloved device was also found "coolest" than Samsung one by the same UK judge. Enjoy the coolest-ness of the judgement. After all, being cool matter more than being right these days, hum?