Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 21st Jul 2012 23:06 UTC
Permalink for comment 527976
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-18
Unless the thousands of users are more than 10k they didn't exactly rake in the profits.
How do you know they where financially healthy? Actually, you said they where starving.
Neither the GPL nor the BSD/MIT license prohibits you from selling your product at a profit.
Good for you. Sounds like an interesting project.
Wow, what a bunch of nonsense. There's plenty of proof to the contrary.
Stop talking before you make an ever bigger fool of yourself.
Well, that's their choice then. They should do what they feel suits them the best, be it open source or closed.