Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 21st Jul 2012 23:06 UTC
Permalink for comment 528178
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-18
Err no. It means the original code is still open source but there might be changes done and used by Apple that isn't open source.
Says you but fortunately that's only your opinion and you don't get to decide on this for anyone else. It's none of your business how anyone else license their code.
I'm not surprised but maybe that's because I don't feel a need to force my choice of license on everyone else.
It's not plagiarism. Do you even know what that is?
Edited 2012-07-25 20:59 UTC