Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 29th Jul 2012 10:48 UTC
Legal Groklaw nails it: "In other words, [Apple and Microsoft] want to disarm the companies that got there first, built the standards, and created the field, while the come-later types clean up on patents on things like slide to unlock or a tablet shape with rounded corners. Then the money flows to Apple and Microsoft, and away from Android - and isn't that really the point of all this, to destroy Android by hook or by crook? The parties who were in the mobile phone business years before Apple or Microsoft even thought about doing it thus get nothing much for their earlier issued patents that have become standards. Apple and Microsoft can't compete on an even field, because the patent system rewards the first to invent (or now, after the recent patent reform, the first to file). Neither Apple nor Microsoft got there first. Samsung was there, since the '90s." To illustrate: Apple is demanding $24 (!) per Samsung device for design patents, while at the same time, Apple also demands that Samsung does not charge more than $0.0049 per standards essential patent per device. This is absolutely, utterly, and entirely indefensible. And then Apple and its supporters have the nerve to claim Samsung is ripping them off. Yes, this pisses me off, and no, that's not because it's Apple doing it (Microsoft is just as guilty). It's because this is plainly, utterly, clearly, and intrinsically unfair.
Permalink for comment 528882
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Oh please...
by MollyC on Mon 30th Jul 2012 03:30 UTC
Member since:

Samsung, regardless of whether they were in the mobile phone business in the 90s, didn't start making BILLIONS of dollars on it until just recently. And how? By blatantly ripping off Apple's designs. So spare me the concerns for Samsung.

Oh, and here's another thing to ponder: by blatantly ripping off Apple's designes, Samsung has pretty much destroyed the Android market for all other OEMs but themselves. Increasingly, Android = Samsung. If Samsung hadn't ripped off Apple's designs, maybe Android would be a healthy, multi-vendor, market. But Samsung is doing a great job of monopolizing the Android market. More power to them, but let's not pretend their recent dominance of the Android market wasn't due to copying the successful, market-proven, Apple designs.

Edited 2012-07-30 03:33 UTC

Reply Score: 0