Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Jul 2012 19:38 UTC, submitted by tupp
Permalink for comment 529112
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-18
No, as Thom said that was the Xerox Star.
Uh, no. Seriously, wtf? Digital's GEM came out in 1985, and so did Windows 1.0. Amiga and Atari ST in 1987. X Windows came out in 1984.
Bada. Not that it matters if they have decades of experience or not. It's the end product that counts.
Yeah, it was SOOO advanced. Windows had nothing on it...
"Advanced" is more than a fancy GUI.
Ah, just like how you claim OSX was "really advanced".
Sure, too bad they rested on their laurels for some 20 years and almost went under. I guess bad experience is also experience.
Ah, so they will stop innovating again and let the competition kill them? Because that's money wise.
Edited 2012-08-01 09:29 UTC