Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 4th Aug 2012 00:54 UTC
Permalink for comment 529810
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-04-12
Good grief Thom. Here is how I (and probably many others) read the article (and most articles):
1) read the summary before clicking on the links.
2) click on the links (I didn't do this this time, I headed to the comments).
3) read the comments.
I didn't do #2 this time because the article was screwed up. Without clicking on the links you are saying that Amiga had multi-user support in 1985.
The summary should at least summarize the intent of the title, which it doesn't. The reason for that is that you are trying to be sarcastic/belittle things rather than write a coherent article, or at least that is how it comes across.
I am no writer but...
"This tweet about mutli-tasking from Tom Warren made me smile. So, it's 2012 and tablets are finally able to do what the Amiga did in 1985. Seems like a bit of a stretch to be excited about that, right? Sure, until I caught myself getting excited - only a bit, but still - by this piece of news about mutli-user support. Update: removed me being an annoyed child."
Just had to add 3 words and the summary is clear.