Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 6th Aug 2012 14:42 UTC
Permalink for comment 529984
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-05-20
I am fairly certain that VxWorks is not a micro-kernel based system. It's one of the things that QNX brags about as being superior to VxWorks; whether that's true or not is open to debate, and VxWorks has considerably higher market share in the embedded space. One thing that always disturbed me about VxWorks is that it uses global variables as REALLY global variables. As in every program you run on the system has access to all the global variables of all the others. Naming conflicts can be a disaster. I much prefer message passing, as is native to QNX and OSE.