Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Aug 2012 12:24 UTC, submitted by henderson101
Legal "Comparing Samsung's flagship products before and after release of the iPhone & iPad, and how Apple's intellectual property infringement claims hold up." A terrible visual guide that ignores not only Samsung's own pre-iPhone designs, but also - and worse yet - the thirty-odd years of mobile computing that preceded the iPhone. Typical of today's technology world: a complete and utter lack of historical sense. Worse yet are the claims about icons: only the phone icon is similar, but Apple did not invent the green phone icon. This is a remnant of virtually all earlier phones which use a green phone icon for initiate/answer call, and a red phone icon for terminate/reject call. Claiming this deserves IP protection is beyond ridiculous, and shows just how low Apple is willing to go.
Permalink for comment 530222
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: adults ?
by Laurence on Wed 8th Aug 2012 08:53 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: adults ?"
Member since:

The point was more - good quality, if possibly biased vs sensationalised garbage. Next I see headlines that are bad puns and stories that were written down the pub after 10 pints. You know, general standard Sun/Mirror, moving towards the utter insanity that the Sunday Sport used to have ("Statue of Elvis found on Mars", "my son turned in to a Baked Bean and I ate him"... that kind of stuff..)

Technically it was a fish finger, not baked bean. Plus biased views are as bad a sensationalised garbage and puns. Or at least, they're bad if the reader isn't aware of the publications bias and thus cannot take an objective opinion from such reports.

Edited 2012-08-08 08:54 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2