Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 8th Aug 2012 06:23 UTC
Legal "The 2010 report, translated from Korean, goes feature by feature, evaluating how Samsung's phone stacks up against the iPhone. Authored by Samsung's product engineering team, the document evaluates everything from the home screen to the browser to the built in apps on both devices. In each case, it comes up with a recommendation on what Samsung should do going forward and in most cases its answer is simple: Make it work more like the iPhone." Pretty damning. We still need to know a few things: how many of these were actually implemented? How common are these types of comparisons (i.e., does Apple have them)? Are these protected by patents and the like? And, but that's largely irrelevant and mostly of interest to me because I'm a translator myself, who translated the document, and how well has he or she done the job?
Permalink for comment 530265
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Apple is not on trial
by MOS6510 on Wed 8th Aug 2012 12:07 UTC in reply to "Apple is not on trial"
MOS6510
Member since:
2011-05-12

It may seem that Samsung is on trial, but Apple sued Samsung and Samsung countersued.

The number of complaints was trimmed down and both cases combined.

Apparently there is a certain place where everybody sits in a courtroom and Samsung objected they had to take the seats of the defendants and even wanted to switch seats each time either side's lawyer came in to action.

Despite all this we all know Samsung actually is the defendant and they copied Apple. It's just the question if this can be proven and if it really matters if they did.

Reply Parent Score: 2