Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 6th Aug 2012 21:50 UTC, submitted by iseyler
Permalink for comment 530296
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-08-08
No, of course not. I used only one example.
He's been paid to write drivers for over 10 years (probably closer to 15) and that has not been true yet.
- 8 Assembly files;
- 58 C files making use of inline Assembly;
So in other words, only a small minority of drivers in the Linux kernel are using asm, which makes my point again that asm is not always a must.
It's not very hard to cite real situations, or dream ones one that asm would be needed. The point is that you said asm is a must -- you did not say it's a must just in certain situations. When I say it's untrue that asm is a must for at least half the things on your list, I am not wrong. You even support this fact yourself (see above).
I never said asm is never needed, but you did say it always is and that is incorrect.