Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 8th Aug 2012 06:23 UTC
Legal "The 2010 report, translated from Korean, goes feature by feature, evaluating how Samsung's phone stacks up against the iPhone. Authored by Samsung's product engineering team, the document evaluates everything from the home screen to the browser to the built in apps on both devices. In each case, it comes up with a recommendation on what Samsung should do going forward and in most cases its answer is simple: Make it work more like the iPhone." Pretty damning. We still need to know a few things: how many of these were actually implemented? How common are these types of comparisons (i.e., does Apple have them)? Are these protected by patents and the like? And, but that's largely irrelevant and mostly of interest to me because I'm a translator myself, who translated the document, and how well has he or she done the job?
Permalink for comment 530306
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[9]: Common practice
by akrosdbay on Wed 8th Aug 2012 16:07 UTC in reply to "RE[8]: Common practice"
Member since:

You just proved my point. Apple BOUGHT FingerWorks. BOUGHT. In other words, Apple did not invent multitouch - FingerWorks did (which isn't even true, since multitouch is older than that).

Thanks for arguing my case so I don't have to!

Awe! look Samsung didn't invent squat either they BOUGHT BOUGHT companies to expand their products.

Google BOUGHT BOUGHT Android, YouTube, etc.etc.. I guess Google didn't invent anything either.

Prove to me that Apple used Fingerworks unmodified in the iPhone.

Like I said it is obvious I am arguing with a child. It is best to ignore a child throwing a tantrum.

Reply Parent Score: 1