Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 11th Aug 2012 17:22 UTC
Permalink for comment 530914
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-03-28
Well, generally I like the Nexus, but I can't somehow agree with all conclusions Tom made, but that's it, everyone of us thinks of different usage pattern for his/her device, so that's perfectly OK.
Visiting the Metallica gig, I saw one guy holding iPAD over his head, filming one song. Well, it looked funny. But still - the lack of rear camera, is just a stupid ommission. I have 2x Canon DSLR, yet I don't carry them with me, so I welcome my HTC Sensation phone has a camera too. Now why to miss it on a tablet? That, in my eyes, is completly stupid ommission. Look at Galaxy Tab 7.7 - does the rear camera ruin design or usability for you? I think not.
One other thing - why does it miss on GSM/3G? Once again - e.g. my mom has her eyes impact by diabetes. I was thinking to get her some tablet. Now how much more would it cost Google to add GSM/3G module? Once again - for few bucks they limit the usage. Galaxy Tab 7.7 has that module.
So, apart from price, for the usage pattern I need, Galaxy Tab wins, and only because Google decided to miss on some usable features. Well, I like Nexus 7 anyway, so I might get one anyway, as the 199 USD is a good price, but ...