Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 17th Aug 2012 22:48 UTC
Permalink for comment 531545
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-03-06
Here in the US, it seems that carriers are increasingly chafing at the cost (to them) of phone subsidies. New-contract phone prices have slowly risen, touching the $350 US barrier. New fees have been added; Verizon now charges a $30 "upgrade fee", which erased completely the incentive they offered me to renew my contract recently (I actually renewed to keep my unlimited data _and_ get a subsidized phone). And the period one must wait before being eligible to get a new subsidized phone has increased.
Nokia is all but dead. It may be a moot point in the end.
On the other hand, with no technological incentive to upgrade phones and renew contracts, as there was with the advent of LTE, maybe they'll have to keep subsidies around in some form to reduce churn.
It's interesting to hear that Dutch carriers subsidize phones, as I had understood that most of Europe's carriers did not. Even here in the US, one can generally get a new subsidized phone every 1.5-2 years, so I'm not sure how much an impact the subsidies have on frequent upgraders.
Besides that, the phone makers are already hurting, at least if they are not Apple or Samsung. Motorola is laying people off. HTC has had two consecutive quarterly losses (see what happens when you don't release kernel source?