Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Aug 2012 21:04 UTC, submitted by suka
Permalink for comment 531591
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-06-02
Where did you get this from? RHEL 7 is schedule to land on third quarter of 2013. Why would that be based on Fedora 18 and not 19.
Like I said before, between these two 'tales' from different GNOME developers (one optimistic and other really doomed) I am more acquainted with the doomed version. People can't use the Shell for productivity work and I've know many people who turned it down.
Fedora is going down on linux usage ranks hand-in-hand with Ubuntu. CentOS has actually gone up quite high, despite the known ego wars within its community. Red Hat is taking notice. The Shell can and will hurt their testbed distro in its current form, so now it needs a revamp again.
The numbers are not lying. People are turning GNOME down. Being optimistic is just a way of ignore the real problems with the platform.