Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Aug 2012 23:17 UTC
Legal "Earlier this month Judge William Alsup ordered Oracle and Google to disclose any journalists or bloggers either has paid that could have commented on the Oracle v. Google case. Both parties responded last week - but Judge Alsup didn't think Google was completely forthright, and has asked the company to try again by the end of the week." Good to know Alsup is on top of this. Google claimed it hadn't paid any shills, but as large and powerful as the company is, I find that very hard to believe.
Permalink for comment 531616
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by MOS6510
by MOS6510 on Tue 21st Aug 2012 07:53 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by MOS6510"
MOS6510
Member since:
2011-05-12


Google AdSense may influence bloggers (anyone want to do a proper psychological study on how and how wide?).


Bloggers are either pro or anti Google, perhaps some even neutral. I don't think AdSense makes much difference and even if it did it's their lives and opinion.

Google probably (I think) doesn't pay anyone, but a clever lawyer may make a case. Even if it's not true it will take time, recourses and may influence public opinion.


But Oracle is not merely influencing Florian Mueller. They're telling him what to say.


My guess is they're not telling him what to say, but a bag of money and a good old fashioned wink should get Florian a pretty good idea how the tone of his articles should be.


Does Google AdSense's terms of service state what bloggers can or cannot say about Google?


If I'd read them I could be the first to do so, but without doing that I have a pretty good guess they have no such restriction.

Reply Parent Score: 2