Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Aug 2012 22:14 UTC
Legal "The web has been alight these past few weeks with the details of the Apple v. Samsung lawsuit. It's been a unique opportunity to peer behind the curtain of how these two companies operate, as the trial seeks to answer the question: did Samsung copy Apple? But there's actually another question that I think is much more interesting to the future of innovation in the technology industry: regardless of whether the courts say that Samsung copied Apple or not, would we all be better off if we allowed - even encouraged - companies to copy one another?" This is very relevant.
Permalink for comment 531617
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by MOS6510
by MOS6510 on Tue 21st Aug 2012 08:03 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by MOS6510"
Member since:

Well, you can copy an idea. Microsoft Surface and RIM's Playbook build on the tablet idea, an idea Apple showed can make money if done right.

Neither Surface or Playbook scream "iPad". A number of Android powered products do, but Samsung went much further than that.

So I consider Surface and Playbook to be innovations and Samsung's stuff copies.

Microsoft and RIM used the success of the iPad to do their own tablets, which you can't blame them for, and they did it their way, which is also good. Samsung just copied the iPad/iPhone.

Reply Parent Score: 2