Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Aug 2012 22:14 UTC
Legal "The web has been alight these past few weeks with the details of the Apple v. Samsung lawsuit. It's been a unique opportunity to peer behind the curtain of how these two companies operate, as the trial seeks to answer the question: did Samsung copy Apple? But there's actually another question that I think is much more interesting to the future of innovation in the technology industry: regardless of whether the courts say that Samsung copied Apple or not, would we all be better off if we allowed - even encouraged - companies to copy one another?" This is very relevant.
Permalink for comment 531648
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Ridiculous
by jgagnon on Tue 21st Aug 2012 14:03 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Ridiculous"
Member since:

You will get more of the bad as any site grows... Slashdot is a great example. It's nearly impossible to have a reasoned conversation there. Here, at least, it is a lot easier to ignore the trolls because there are fewer of them.

To answer your question, nothing stops people from leaving Site A and going to Site B except their attachment to A, however strong or weak that may be. This is where the copying argument gets hard to quantify. Plenty of folks stick with Apple BECAUSE it is Apple, not because of any single quality or quantity. If Samsung comes along and makes a cheaper clone that doesn't mean everyone that is currently using the original will switch to the cheaper clone. Some will, no doubt, but those people weren't the kind of customers that Apple was looking for to begin with.

Reply Parent Score: 4