Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Aug 2012 22:14 UTC
Legal "The web has been alight these past few weeks with the details of the Apple v. Samsung lawsuit. It's been a unique opportunity to peer behind the curtain of how these two companies operate, as the trial seeks to answer the question: did Samsung copy Apple? But there's actually another question that I think is much more interesting to the future of innovation in the technology industry: regardless of whether the courts say that Samsung copied Apple or not, would we all be better off if we allowed - even encouraged - companies to copy one another?" This is very relevant.
Permalink for comment 531655
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by MOS6510
by lucas_maximus on Tue 21st Aug 2012 15:21 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by MOS6510"
Member since:

Not in the UK.

Everyone was using Nokias on pay monthly contracts and pay as you go for ages. Most feature phones were Nokias were not much more than 3210s on steroids.

This was selling for the same price a HTC desire in 2005, and it was hardly more than a 3210 with a colour screen and a web browser and a few Java Apps.

Sorry Treo, PalmOS and Windows Mobile was hardly mainsteam and didn't have the impact the iPhone did. I knew one person that had a Treo and work gave him that.

I never met anyone that was running Windows Mobile and Palm phones were mostly unheard of.

A lot of people in the UK love their blackberry's, mainly because they are cheap with contracts and we send a lot of SMS messages.

Reply Parent Score: 1