Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 22nd Aug 2012 07:50 UTC
Permalink for comment 531875
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-06-02
I don't know about the veracity of this (you can decide on the nature of the ultimate source, here http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1593270100?ie=UTF8&tag=bluemountai...) but it appears Wozniak understood the potential problems, and likely source, of the inspiration to name Apple Computers, Apple Computers:
http://cgull8m.hubpages.com/hub/Why-Apple-is-Apple-History-of-the-b...
It's easier to drop a potentially conflicting name by not employing it in the first place. It's called primary market research.
It seems however that you are relenting - again, to follow on from what you are saying, rail against the company or its products as much as you want, but Bill Gates has given away millions and millions of Dollars.
Jobs took the opposite view entirely; Tim Cook appears to recognise the legacy of this and is at least doing something about it, which I applaud:
http://venturebeat.com/2012/02/02/apple-charity-efforts/
Credit where credit is due.
Orf