Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Aug 2012 08:29 UTC
Apple "AT&T is defending its decision to limit the use of Apple's video chat feature, FaceTime, to its Mobile Share data plans by saying that the limitation does not violate the FCC's net neutrality rules. The company wrote in a blog post on Wednesday that some groups had 'another knee-jerk reaction' to AT&T's limitation, but the company argues that its decision meets all FCC requirements." You can expect Verizon to follow suit soon. Carriers don't do things like this unless they know the competition will tag along. This also happens to explain why Apple probably can't do much about it; if both Verizon and AT&T give FaceTime the boot like this, there's little Apple can do. For what it's worth - I'm happy The Netherlands (and Chile!) has unconditional net neutrality. This would not fly here, further illustrating the need for net neutrality.
Permalink for comment 531888
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by marcp
by ssokolow on Thu 23rd Aug 2012 10:32 UTC in reply to "Comment by marcp"
ssokolow
Member since:
2010-01-21

Not as eloquent as I've seen but well said.

This sort of thing is why I use neither Microsoft nor Apple products at home, why I can count the number of closed-source packages on my Linux PC on one hand, and why I don't own a cell phone.

(Well, that and cellphone plans are expensive here in Canada and Google Now is just plain creepy.)

Edited 2012-08-23 10:33 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2