Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Aug 2012 14:42 UTC
Legal Fantastic work by The Verge. "Although Apple and Samsung did their best to present high-level narratives about copying and product development throughout the trial, the jury's work is far more complicated than simply asking if Samsung copied Apple. Instead, the 20-page verdict form presents around 700 extremely specific questions, divided into 33 groups. These questions exhaustively cover everything at issue in the trial, down to exact dollar amounts Samsung might owe for each of 28 devices accused of copying Apple intellectual property." I don't know just how much power a US jury has, but if I were them, I'd buy a tl;dr stamp and use it on every page of the verdict form. Samsung and Apple ought to be ashamed of themselves.
Permalink for comment 531958
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by Radio
by Delgarde on Thu 23rd Aug 2012 22:43 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Radio"
Delgarde
Member since:
2008-08-19

McElhinny - If you find Samsung infringed, "you will have reaffirmed the American patent system. You will have upended Samsung's cynical game plan."


Yes, well... they *would* say that, wouldn't they?

Reply Parent Score: 2