Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th Aug 2012 23:54 UTC
Legal And just like that, within a matter of days, the jury has reached a verdict in Apple vs. Samsung. The basic gist is simple: Apple's software patents are valid, and many Samsung devices infringe upon them. Apple's iPhone 3G trade dress is valid, and Samsung's Galaxy S line infringes, but other devices did not. Samsung did not infringe Apple's iPad design patent. Apple did not infringe any of Samsung's patents. Apple is awarded a little over $1 billion in damages. Competition lost today, and developers in the United States should really start to get worried - software patents got validated big time today.
Permalink for comment 532139
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Torbjorn Vik Lunde
Member since:

I think a lot of people are very uneasy about the similarity of (including the devs themselves). They are even using Bootstrap (open source, created by Twitter) to make this thing.

One reason many would give is that Twitter is changing from Twitter used to be to something else. is then more of a clone of what Twitter-used to be, not what it is. (Weak argument, I know.)

The most important point however is that is intentionally a "dumb pipe". That is, the most important function is to hold data, and is completely ok with you not using their website. Normally it’s horribly economically to be a dumb pipe, but since people pay for it actually works out.

I also think you can look at more as this data-pipe, and that the Twitter-like thing they are building now just happens to be an example that runs on it. The dream of the devs is to create this plattform people can build apps that use it for plumbing (sort of like Heroku, but on a much higher level). Being a plumb this way is very much opposite of what Twitter is today.

Reply Parent Score: 1