Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Aug 2012 12:48 UTC
In the News "We all know about the gadgets that get showered with constant praise - the icons, the segment leaders, and the game changers. Tech history will never forget the Altair 8800, the Walkman, the BlackBerry, and the iPhone. But people do forget - and quickly - about the devices that failed to change the world: the great ideas doomed by mediocre execution, the gadgets that arrived before the market was really ready, or the technologies that found their stride just as the world was pivoting to something else." I was a heavy user of BeOS, Zip drives, and MiniDisc (I was an MD user up until about 2 years ago). I'm starting to see a pattern here.
Permalink for comment 532222
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: OS/2
by bassbeast on Sat 25th Aug 2012 12:30 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: OS/2"
Member since:

Actually it wasn't the ads that killed OS/2 (In fact the article you linked to is incorrect, Paramount didn't have a fit until AFTER the unveiling, Stewart couldn't show because he was filming a Next gen movie so they got Mulgrew because Voyager was still on) it was the totally retarded chip decision that gave it no chance in hell.

You see IBM had the right to make their own 286, as well as to source from AMD as a second source, thanks to their contract with Intel. But Intel was trying to stop allowing second sourcing and thus refused to sell IBM the rights to second source the 386. Now for those that don't remember the 386 and 486 were pretty big steps up from the 286, but IBM kept trying to push 286 machines (at the same price the others were selling 386 and later 486) because it meant more profit for them.

Naturally Compaq and the rest of the gang of nine were happy to take that business and after IBM tried to stick it to them with MCA there was no way they were taking an IBM OS, so bye bye OS/2, where the only machines that came with it were underpowered AND overpriced.

Now as for TFA I don't know if these would count or not but I always though Compact Flash and Capture cards would end up a lot bigger than they did. I mean while everyone else was still struggling for space i was carrying a whopping 64Mb! on a CF with a USB 1.0 adapter, that was a ton of space! And you could use it as an IDE drive with a simple adapter! Now you only see CF in a few tiny niches, replaced by itty bitty thumbsticks.

And in 97-07 I thought cap cards were just the coolest thing, turn your PC into a DVR! You can time shift, backup your favorite shows, it was cool! Sadly the software blew chunks and by the time units with truly decent software and drivers came out everyone had moved to just watching on the net. I've still got a brand new cap card still in the box I bought when my cable switched to digital...only to never bother since I can just watch everything on the net now...doh.

Reply Parent Score: 2