Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 27th Aug 2012 11:32 UTC
Permalink for comment 532668
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-18
It jumps straight to: "the court of appeals will review both infringement and the validity of the patent claims." What patent claims? Was there a court case you are responding to? What was the verdict?
To say there is no bitterness in the statement is silly.
If that's your criteria of what is bitter, then I guess it's bitter.
In my book, that's not bitterness. That's "not saying anything that could get them in trouble in court at a later date".
To say there is bitterness in the statement is projection.