Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Aug 2012 08:29 UTC
Apple "AT&T is defending its decision to limit the use of Apple's video chat feature, FaceTime, to its Mobile Share data plans by saying that the limitation does not violate the FCC's net neutrality rules. The company wrote in a blog post on Wednesday that some groups had 'another knee-jerk reaction' to AT&T's limitation, but the company argues that its decision meets all FCC requirements." You can expect Verizon to follow suit soon. Carriers don't do things like this unless they know the competition will tag along. This also happens to explain why Apple probably can't do much about it; if both Verizon and AT&T give FaceTime the boot like this, there's little Apple can do. For what it's worth - I'm happy The Netherlands (and Chile!) has unconditional net neutrality. This would not fly here, further illustrating the need for net neutrality.
Permalink for comment 532715
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Who use facetime?
by MOS6510 on Tue 28th Aug 2012 12:02 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Who use facetime?"
MOS6510
Member since:
2011-05-12

This is more about webcams. FaceTime is Apple's video calling, which works only via WiFi making is already half useless.

Personally I see no reason, very most of all the time, to be able to see the other person. I'd rather hold the phone to my ear than keep it in front of me.

Also I don't find it very easy to make a FaceTime call. I'd rather make a "normal" call and have the iPhone indicate it's also possible to switch on the cam (like is switches to iMessage from text message when it finds out the target is an iPhone). Now I have no idea who has and who hasn't FaceTime.

If a FaceTime call fails it could be because they have no FaceTime or are not in WiFi range. So why bother with the hassle and not make a voice call straight away.

Reply Parent Score: 2