Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Aug 2012 08:29 UTC
Apple "AT&T is defending its decision to limit the use of Apple's video chat feature, FaceTime, to its Mobile Share data plans by saying that the limitation does not violate the FCC's net neutrality rules. The company wrote in a blog post on Wednesday that some groups had 'another knee-jerk reaction' to AT&T's limitation, but the company argues that its decision meets all FCC requirements." You can expect Verizon to follow suit soon. Carriers don't do things like this unless they know the competition will tag along. This also happens to explain why Apple probably can't do much about it; if both Verizon and AT&T give FaceTime the boot like this, there's little Apple can do. For what it's worth - I'm happy The Netherlands (and Chile!) has unconditional net neutrality. This would not fly here, further illustrating the need for net neutrality.
Permalink for comment 532719
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Who use facetime?
by zima on Tue 28th Aug 2012 12:18 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Who use facetime?"
zima
Member since:
2005-07-06

Though webcams overall and FaceTime are so related that they both fall into the same general pitfalls - especially since FaceTime is also an OSX and iPad thing, is it not?

Anyway, multi-platform availability of Skype or Gmail video helps them only marginally...

BTW, with mobile, I remember some research into how people are actually using mobile videocalls - turns out that, after the first few "novelty calls", the primary (but even that rare, of course) usage scenario is to show the other person not yourself, but your immediate surroundings. Ironically enough, that doesn't even require a front-facing camera & actually works better with the rear one... (can you switch to the rear camera as video source in iPhone? I know of few SE "feature phones" that could do it, and had one which had only the rear camera - but still could do 3G videocalls)

Reply Parent Score: 2