Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 29th Aug 2012 22:52 UTC
Linux Miguel de Icaza: "To sum up: (a) First dimension: things change too quickly, breaking both open source and proprietary software alike; (b) incompatibility across Linux distributions. This killed the ecosystem for third party developers trying to target Linux on the desktop. You would try once, do your best effort to support the 'top' distro or if you were feeling generous 'the top three' distros. Only to find out that your software no longer worked six months later. Supporting Linux on the desktop became a burden for independent developers." Mac OS X came along to scoop up the Linux defectors.
Permalink for comment 533163
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by woegjiub
by lucas_maximus on Thu 30th Aug 2012 08:01 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by woegjiub"
Member since:

For the most part, that's already the case - for example, an app written to Gtk+ 2.0 back in 2002 will still probably compile and run on Gtk+ 2.24 today. It probably uses parts of that API which have long been deprecated, but it will still work. That's over ten years of stability.

The work probably doesn't fill me with Enthusiasm

For an actual API break, you have to go to Gtk+ 3.0, where they finally cleaned out all of those old deprecated functions. But even then, it's not a problem, because the 2.0 and 3.0 libraries have been designed to co-exist..

Yes but GTK is one GUI library out of many that work on the platform.

The difference is with MacOSX/iOS, Windows and Android you have a standard set of APIs that you can expect to be there and expect to work in a certain way.l

This doesn't exist in Linux except for the basic userland.

Reply Parent Score: 2